F712

(Rev. 173, Issued: 11-22-17, Effective: 11-28-17, Implementation: 11-28-17)

§483.30(c) Frequency of physician visits.

§483.30(c)(1) The resident must be seen by a physician at least once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission, and at least once every 60 days thereafter.

§483.30(c)(2) A physician visit is considered timely if it occurs not later than 10 days after the date the visit was required.

§483.30(c)(3) Except as provided in paragraphs (c)(4) and (f) of this section, all require physician visits must be made by the physician personally.

DEFINITIONS §483.30(c)

Must be seen, for purposes of the visits required by §483.30(c)(1), means that the physician or NPP must make actual face-to-face contact with the resident, and at the same physical location, not via a telehealth arrangement. There is no requirement for this type of contact at the time of admission, since the decision to admit an individual to a nursing facility (whether from a hospital or from the individual’s own residence) generally involves physician contact during the period immediately preceding the admission.

“Non-physician practitioner (NPP)” means a nurse practitioner (NP), clinical nurse specialist (CNS) or physician assistant (PA).

GUIDANCE §483.30(c)

The timing of physician visits is based on the admission date of the resident.

In a SNF, the first physician visit (this includes the initial comprehensive visit) must be conducted within the first 30 days after admission, and then at 30 day intervals up until 90 days after the admission date. After the first 90 days, visits must be conducted at least once every 60 days thereafter.

Permitting up to 10 days’ slippage of a due date will not affect the next due date. However, do not specifically look at the timetables for physician visits unless there is indication of inadequate medical care. The regulation states that the physician (or his/her delegate) must visit the resident at least every 30 or 60 days. There is no provision for physicians to use discretion in visiting at intervals longer than those specified at §483.30(c), F712. Although the physician may not delegate the responsibility for conducting the initial visit in a SNF, NPPs may perform other medically necessary visits prior to and after the physician’s initial visit, as allowed by State law.

After the initial physician visit in SNFs, where States allow their use, a NPP may make every other required visit. (See §483.30(e), F714 Physician delegation of tasks in SNFs.) These alternate visits, as well as medically necessary visits, may be performed and signed by the NPP. (Physician co-signature is not required, unless required by State law).

In a NF, the physician visit requirement may be satisfied in accordance with State law by a NPP who is not an employee of the facility but who is working in collaboration with a physician and who is licensed by the State and performing within the state’s scope of practice. (See §483.30(f)).

In a NF, medically necessary visits performed by NPPs employed by the facility, may not take the place of physician required visits, nor may the visit count towards meeting the physician visit schedule prescribed at §483.20(c)(1).

In SNFs and NFs, facility policy that allows NPPs to conduct required visits, and/or allows a 10-day slippage in the time of the required visit, does not relieve the physician of the obligation to visit a resident personally when the resident’s medical condition makes that visit necessary.

Table 1: Authority for Non-Physician Practitioners to Perform Visits, Sign Orders and Sign Medicare Part A Certifications/Re-certifications when Permitted by the State

*A NPP may provide admission orders if a physician personally approved in writing a recommendation for admission to the facility prior to the resident’s admission. For additional requirements on physician recommendation for admission and admission orders, see §483.30(a), F710.

^ Other required visits are the physician visits required by §483.30(c)(1) other than the initial comprehensive visit.

+ Medically necessary visits are independent of required physician visits §483.30(c)(1) and may be performed prior to the initial comprehensive visit as permitted under state laws.

±Though not part of a compliance determination for this section, this column is provided for clarification and relates specifically to coverage of a Part A Medicare stay requirements, which can take place only in a Medicare-certified SNF.

In a facility where beds are dually-certified under Medicare and Medicaid, the facility must determine how the particular resident stay is being paid in order to identify whether physician delegation of tasks is permissible and if a NPP may perform the tasks. For example:

• For residents in a Part A Medicare stay, the NPP must follow the requirements for physician services in a SNF. This includes, at the option of a physician, required physician visits alternated between personal visits by the physician and visits by a NPP after the physician makes the initial comprehensive visit; and
• For residents in a Medicaid stay, the NPP must follow the requirements for physician services in a NF. A NPP who is not employed by the facility and is working in collaboration with a physician may perform any required physician task for a resident in a Medicaid-stay, at the option of the State. (NPPs employed by the facility may not perform required physician visits but may perform other medically necessary visits)

It is expected that visits will occur at the facility rather than the doctor’s office unless office equipment is needed or a resident specifically requests an office visit. If the facility has established policy that residents leave the grounds for medical care, the resident does not object, and this policy does not infringe on his/her rights including the right to privacy, there is no prohibition to this practice. The facility should inform the resident of this practice, in accordance with §483.10(g)(16), F581, Notice of rights and services.

Certifications/Re-certifications in SNFs: Under 42 CFR §424.20, certifications and re- certifications are required to verify that a resident requires daily skilled nursing care or rehabilitation services. NPs, CNSs, and PAs who are not employed by the facility and who are working in collaboration with a physician may sign the required initial certification and re- certifications when permitted under the scope of practice for the State. 42 CFR §424.20(e)(2).

PROBES §483.30(c)

• Does the scheduling and frequency of physician visits relate to any identified quality of care problems?
• If the resident is admitted under a SNF stay, did the physician conduct the initial comprehensive visit, in-person, within the first 30 days?
• If the resident is admitted under a NF stay, did the physician or a NPP who is not employed by the facility but who is working in collaboration with a physician conduct the initial comprehensive visit, in-person, within the first 30 days?
• Are physician visits conducted at the required intervals, with no more than 10 days slippage from the due date?
• In a SNF, if the physician delegates required visits to a NPP, does the physician personally conduct alternate visits with the NPP as required?
• Does the resident or resident representative report meeting with the physician? If so, how often?

POTENTIAL TAGS FOR ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATION

If the failure of the physician to visit the resident at the required intervals resulted in a negative outcome to the resident, also investigate compliance with §483.30(a), F710, Resident’s care supervised by a physician.

DEFICIENCY CATEGORIZATION

An example of Level 4, immediate jeopardy to resident health and safety, includes, but is not limited to:

• The facility failed to ensure the attending physician conducted required visits for several consecutive months in the facility. The physician responded to phone calls and provided verbal orders during this time-frame, however did not visit and make face-to-face contact with the resident, who experienced a significant negative change in status. No other physicians or NPPs visited the resident. This placed the resident at risk for serious harm or death.